TAKE ACTION: ASMFC Public Hearings On Recreational Black Sea Bass Management

sea bass

Draft Addendum XXX was initiated to consider alternative regional management approaches for the recreational fishery, including options for regional allocation of the recreational harvest limit (RHL) based on historical harvest and exploitable biomass. The Draft Addendum also includes an option for coastwide management of black sea bass recreational fisheries should a regional approach not be approved for management.

A copy of the Draft Addendum XXX is available at:

In recent years, challenges in the black sea bass recreational fishery have centered on providing equitable access to the resource in the face of uncertain population size, structure, and distribution. Since 2012, the recreational fishery has been managed under an ad-hoc regional management approach, whereby the states of Massachusetts through New Jersey have individually crafted measures aimed at reducing harvest by the same percent, while the states of Delaware through North Carolina have set their regulations consistent with the federal waters measures. While this approach allowed the states flexibility in setting measures, some states expressed concerns about equity and accountability in constraining harvest to coastwide catch limits. Additionally, the 2016 Benchmark Stock Assessment provided information on the abundance and distribution of the resource along the coast that was not previously available to include in the management program.

Draft Addendum XXX proposes two approaches for regional allocation of the RHL in the black sea bass recreational fishery: (1) allocation based on a combination of stock biomass and harvest information, or (2) allocation based solely on historical harvest. The regional allocation options offer advantages over coastwide regulations by addressing geographic differences in the stock (size, abundance, and seasonality) while allowing for more uniformity in measures between neighboring states. The Draft Addendum also proposes an option for evaluating harvest and adjusting measures against the annual catch limit, which aims to reduce year to year changes in management measures.

Stakeholders are encouraged to provide input on Draft Addendum XXX either by attending a state public hearing or providing written comment. To aid the submission of public comment, please refer to the decision tree found in Appendix III on PDF page 23, which outlines the management options being considered. Public comment will be accepted until 5:00 PM (EST) on January 22, 2018 and should be forwarded to Caitlin Starks, Fishery Management Plan Coordinator, 1050 N. Highland St., Suite 200 A-N, Arlington, Virginia 22201; 703.842.0741 (fax) or at comments@asmfc.org (Subject line: Draft Addendum XXX).

Action on the Draft Addendum is scheduled to occur on February 8, at the ASMFC 2018 Winter Meeting in Arlington, VA. For more information, please contact Caitlin Starks of the ASMFC, at cstarks@asmfc.org or 703.842.0740; or Nichola Meserve of MA DMF at nichola.meserve@state.ma.us or 617-626-1531.


January 9, 2018 at 6 PM
Bourne Community Center
239 Main Street
Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts

2 on “TAKE ACTION: ASMFC Public Hearings On Recreational Black Sea Bass Management

  1. kevin e Slattery

    Click on this Draft Addendum and try to read it. This whole 30 page document is gibberish. The “options’ they are asking us to comment on are pointless. This is whole ‘public comment period’ is required by law before regulations are enacted. In the most disingenuous,cynical way the Black Sea Bass Board ‘working group’ are throwing a bunch of purposefully confusing ‘Options” at us for comment. The important questions are presented as a ‘done deal’ and the details will be filled in at the last minute, behind closed doors. The public will never get to make a meaningful comment. Shame on these people. It is definitely time for Massachusetts to choose “formal appeal” and “non-compliance” as New Jersey did successfully with fluke last year. Go to the comment page and tell them what you think. Go to the meeting next week in Buzzards Bay and speak up.
    On the issue of preserving the health of Mass. the best thing we could do is close down the winter fisheries in other states that are killing the fish that would spend the summer and fall in Mass.

  2. John W

    I submitted comments in favor of the alignment described in Table A.6.

    MA & RI viewed as one fishery. With a fishery season of 126 days. Longer than fishermen in MA had in 2017.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *