Landmark Legislation To Benefit Saltwater Anglers Advances In U.S. House

The U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Natural Resources approved H.R. 200, a bill sponsored by Congressman Don Young (R-Alaska) that amends the 1976 Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to provide flexibility for fishery managers and stability for fishermen. A coalition of organizations representing the saltwater recreational fishing and boating community endorsed H.R. 200 and highlighted the importance of incorporating saltwater recreational fishing management provisions into the nation’s primary law governing federal fisheries management.

On April 6, 2017, Congressman Garret Graves (R-La.), a leader on recreational fishing issues, introduced H.R. 2023, the Modern Fish Act, to address the challenges facing recreational fishermen in the federal fisheries management system. He was joined by a bipartisan list of 24 cosponsors. Original cosponsors include Congressmen Gene Green (D-Texas), Daniel Webster (R-Fla.) and Rob Wittman (R-Va.). The Modern Fish Act’s legislative language was ultimately included in H.R. 200.

“We owe great thanks to Chairman Rob Bishop, Congressman Don Young and Congressman Garret Graves for working together to bring meaningful change to recreational fisheries management through the reauthorization of the nation’s marine fisheries law,” said Jeff Angers, president of the Center for Sportfishing Policy. “This is a major step forward in implementing the vision set forth by the Morris-Deal Report for the future of saltwater recreational fishing. The importance of this legislation to the recreational fishing and boating community was made clear by tens of thousands of advocates who have made their voices heard by contacting their elected officials in recent months.”

Through years of hard work, the priorities of the recreational fishing and boating community were identified and presented to federalpolicy makers by the Commission on Saltwater Recreational Fisheries Management. This group is also referred to as the Morris-Deal Commission, named for co-chairs Johnny Morris, founder and CEO of Bass Pro Shops, and Scott Deal, president of Maverick Boat Group. In 2014, the Morris-Deal Commission released “A Vision for Managing America’s Saltwater Recreational Fisheries,” which included six key policy changes to produce the full range of saltwater recreational fishing’s social, economic and conservation benefits to the nation.

Many of the recommendations of the Morris-Deal Commission are addressed by the Modern Fish Act and now included in H.R. 200. This legislation addresses many of the challenges faced by recreational anglers, including allowing alternative management tools for recreational fishing, reexamining fisheries allocations and improving recreational data collection. The bill aims to benefit fishing access and conservation by incorporating modern management approaches, scienceand technology to guide decision-making.

On December 8, the coalition requested in a letter to the U.S. House Committee on Natural Resources that the Modern Fish Act be included in the reauthorization of the Magnuson-Stevens Act and moved to the House floor for final passage.

Furthermore, 135 marine recreational fishing and boating industry executives signed a letter to the U.S. House Committee on Natural Resources on December 11, in support of the Modern Fish Act and its inclusion in the final reauthorization of the Magnuson-Stevens Act. The saltwater fishing economy spans the entire United States not just the U.S. coastline, as demonstrated by the list of signatories.

“America’s 11 million saltwater anglers have a $63 billion economic impact annually and generate 440,000 jobs,” said Mike Nussman, presidentand CEO of the American Sportfishing Association. “However, recreational fishing has been treated as an afterthought in the federal fisheries management system for decades. If enacted, H.R. 200 would finally give saltwater recreational fishing the attention it deserves in the Magnuson-Stevens Act.”

“The need to revise the one-size-fits-all approach of the Magnuson-Stevens Act has been abundantly clear in recent years as anglers face unreasonably limited access to public marine resources,” said Thom Dammrich, president of the National Marine Manufacturers Association. “Stakeholders of the recreational boating industry, a uniquely American-made industry with an economic footprint of more than $121 billion annually and more than 650,000 American jobs, are encouraged by the Committee’s action today, and we hope to see final passage by the House very soon.”

“We commend the U.S. House Committee on Natural Resources for taking the next step in reauthorizing the Magnuson-Stevens Act,” said Patrick Murray, president of Coastal Conservation Association. “The need to update our nation’s fisheries management system to ensure the conservation of our public marine resources and reasonable public access to those resources is abundantly clear. We look forward to the full House consideration of the bill.”

“The provisions of the Modern Fish Act included in H.R. 200 would provide parity for federally-managed recreational fisheries while continuing to safeguard the conservation of our fisheries resources,” said Jeff Crane, president of the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation. “In addition to Chairman Bishop, Congressman Young and Congressman Graves, a big thanks to the bipartisan House leadership of the Congressional Sportsmen’s Caucus for their co-sponsorship of these important measures on behalf of America’s anglers.”

“We thank Chairman Rob Bishop for expediting this Committee markup and moving the Magnuson-Stevens Act reauthorization bill forward,” said Jim Donofrio, president of the Recreational Fishing Alliance. “We also commend Congressman Don Young and Congressman Garret Graves for drafting this landmark legislation that will increase angler access while continuing to rebuild recreational fisheries.”

“Recreational fishing and commercial fishing are two fundamentally different activities needing distinctly different management tools,” said Angers. “Since 1976, recreational anglers have been shoehorned into a management regime that was never designed to manage recreational fishing. H.R. 200 would make critical changes to the Magnuson-Stevens Act to better manage recreational fisheries.”

Following today’s vote, the coalition encourages House leadership to quickly bring H.R. 200 to the floor for final passage. Marine recreational anglers and boaters are eager to see this landmark legislation move through the House and Senate and signed into law.

  1. Tancio Garcia

    This article presents a fairy one-sided (read “lobbiest”) take on the “Modern Fish Act” – something that can be interpreted as an attempt to mislead well-meaning recreational fishermen. As someone who values both the recreational and commercial fishing sectors and the many ways they benefit society, please take a look at the article linked below – a well-written rebuttal that provides an equally valuable perspective on why one should not automatically support the “Act” just because it appears in “On The Water”. Thanks.

    http://conservefish.org/2017/12/14/modern-fish-act-not-okay/

    Reply
    • John K.

      I agree with Tancio. Read about the bill before you support it. It is designed to benefit the boat
      and marine supply industry and is designed for the Southeast coast. It’s about greed and money
      and is not about fish conservation.

      Reply
  2. Tom Poirier

    The biggest problem is that the “science” is not accurate, and regulators do not know what is happening in the “real world”. Example: the Black Sea Bass regulations. I have been fishing Narragansett Bay for over 30 years. For the last four years I have been catching loads of BSB of all sizes. Four inch BSA on fluke rigs has been the norm. You cannot catch Scup because you cannot get through all the BSB. I have written my local representatives on all the management boards to tell them what I have been experiencing. All the fisherman at my Marina also see the same thing. But we are told we need more science, and surveys before they can ease regulations on BSB. I have had a Saltwater Fishing License since they were required, have had a boat for 20 years, and have fished 30 years. I have never been surveyed by any Fisheries Management
    person. The problem is the “scientists” with all their PH.D’s need to get out into the field and see what is going on in the “real” world. I am in support of anything, including this legislation that will change the existing system. The system is broken and needs to be fixed . Time to try something different, because what they are doing now is not working !!!!

    Reply
  3. Tony Fleck

    Very surprised you support this as the act substantially weakens the provisions of current law that prevent overfishing and require that overfished stocks be rebuilt.

    Reply
  4. Joe GaNun

    Too many loopholes. Too much flexibility to cheat the system. Nicely written article that says nothing. You have to read the bill. I’m surprised that your magazine would present this as “Landmark”. You should have lead with “Questionable”.

    Reply
  5. RHT

    It’s time for there to be an organization that represents conservation minded recreational salt water anglers. Clearly the organizations who make claim to that goal have sold themselves to short term economic gain.

    Reply
  6. Ken

    Modern fish act- short-term” economic gain for a few.. . No reason whatsoever for saltwater fishermen to support this bill.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

  • (will not be published)